Fiber Cement vs Stucco: Which Exterior is Better? This question often arises when homeowners embark on exterior renovations. Both fiber cement and stucco offer durable and aesthetically pleasing options, but understanding their key differences is crucial for making an informed decision. This comprehensive comparison will delve into the manufacturing processes, durability, cost, maintenance, environmental impact, aesthetic options, and safety aspects of each material, ultimately helping you choose the best exterior solution for your home.
We’ll explore the nuances of each material, considering factors such as lifespan, resistance to damage, and maintenance requirements. A detailed cost analysis, including material and labor costs, will be presented, along with a comparison of their thermal performance and energy efficiency contributions. Finally, we’ll examine the aesthetic versatility of both fiber cement and stucco, showcasing their adaptability to various architectural styles and design preferences.
Initial Comparison
Choosing between fiber cement and stucco for your home’s exterior involves understanding their distinct properties and manufacturing processes. Both offer durability and aesthetic appeal, but their suitability depends on various factors, including climate, budget, and desired aesthetic. This section will delve into a detailed comparison of these two popular exterior cladding materials.
Manufacturing Processes of Fiber Cement and Stucco
Fiber cement siding is a composite material manufactured by combining Portland cement, cellulose fibers (often wood pulp), and silica sand. These ingredients are mixed, formed into panels or boards under high pressure, and then cured in a controlled environment. The curing process allows the cement to harden, creating a strong and durable product. This process results in a relatively consistent and uniform product. In contrast, stucco is a mixture of Portland cement, sand, lime, and water. This mixture is applied wet to a prepared surface (typically wire mesh over sheathing) in multiple coats. Each coat serves a specific purpose: a scratch coat for adhesion, a brown coat for building thickness and shaping, and a finish coat for texture and color. The curing process relies on evaporation of water, making the final product more susceptible to variations in consistency and texture depending on environmental conditions during application and curing.
Appearance and Texture of Fiber Cement and Stucco
Fiber cement siding typically presents a smooth, clean surface, although textured finishes are also available to mimic wood grain or other natural materials. The color is often integrated into the material during manufacturing, resulting in consistent and long-lasting color. The appearance is generally consistent across panels, with minimal variation in texture. Stucco, on the other hand, offers a much wider range of textures and finishes. From smooth, polished surfaces to heavily textured, rough finishes, the possibilities are virtually limitless. The color is typically applied as a final coat, often with a variety of pigments and techniques used to create unique looks. This means stucco’s appearance can vary significantly depending on the skill of the applicator and the chosen finish. The texture can also vary considerably across the surface, depending on the application techniques used.
Architectural Styles and Material Choice
Fiber cement siding’s clean lines and versatility make it suitable for a wide range of architectural styles, from contemporary and modern designs to more traditional homes. Its ability to mimic wood grain makes it a popular choice for homes styled in Craftsman, Farmhouse, or even Victorian styles. The consistent surface lends itself well to sharp lines and precise detailing. Stucco, with its diverse textural possibilities, is particularly well-suited for Mediterranean, Spanish Colonial, and Southwestern styles. Its ability to create textured surfaces complements the organic and earthy aesthetic of these architectural traditions. However, stucco can also be used in modern designs, where its smooth finishes and clean lines can contribute to a sleek, minimalist look.
Durability and Longevity
Choosing between fiber cement and stucco for your home’s exterior involves considering their respective lifespans and resistance to various forms of damage. Both materials offer considerable durability, but their performance varies depending on factors like climate and maintenance. Understanding these differences is crucial for making an informed decision.
Fiber cement and stucco exhibit different strengths and weaknesses when it comes to withstanding the test of time and environmental stressors. Fiber cement, a composite material of cement, cellulose fibers, and other additives, is known for its exceptional strength and resistance to impact, while stucco, a mixture of cement, sand, lime, and water, is more susceptible to cracking and damage.
Climate and Weather Impact
The climate significantly influences the long-term performance of both fiber cement and stucco siding. In regions with extreme temperature fluctuations, stucco can be more prone to cracking due to expansion and contraction. Similarly, heavy rainfall or prolonged exposure to moisture can lead to water damage and potential mold growth in stucco if not properly installed and maintained. Fiber cement, being more resistant to moisture, generally performs better in humid or rainy climates. However, in areas with frequent freeze-thaw cycles, even fiber cement can experience some minor cracking, although generally less extensively than stucco. Exposure to intense UV radiation from sunlight can cause both materials to fade over time, though fiber cement is often formulated with UV-resistant pigments to mitigate this effect. In arid climates, stucco can become brittle and more prone to cracking, while fiber cement tends to maintain its structural integrity better.
Maintenance Requirements
Regular maintenance is essential to prolong the lifespan of both fiber cement and stucco. Neglecting maintenance can lead to accelerated deterioration and costly repairs.
| Feature | Fiber Cement | Stucco |
|---|---|---|
| Cleaning | Periodic cleaning with water and a mild detergent is usually sufficient. Pressure washing should be done cautiously to avoid damage. | Requires more frequent cleaning to prevent dirt and grime buildup, which can lead to staining and damage. Pressure washing may be needed, but should be done carefully to avoid damaging the surface. |
| Repair | Minor repairs, such as replacing damaged panels, are relatively straightforward. Larger repairs may require professional assistance. | Cracks and chips require prompt repair to prevent further damage. Repairing stucco often involves matching the texture and color, which can be challenging. |
| Painting | Generally requires less frequent repainting than stucco, due to its inherent durability and resistance to fading. | May require repainting every 5-10 years, depending on the climate and exposure to the elements. |
| Lifespan | 50+ years with proper maintenance. | 30-50 years with proper maintenance, but can be significantly shorter if not properly maintained. |
Cost Analysis
Choosing between fiber cement and stucco involves a significant financial consideration. The total cost depends not only on the materials themselves but also on labor costs, regional variations, and the complexity of the project. This section provides a breakdown of the typical costs associated with each material, enabling a more informed decision-making process.
Both fiber cement and stucco exhibit price fluctuations based on geographical location and the quality of materials used. Higher-quality materials generally translate to increased upfront costs, but may result in long-term savings due to improved durability and longevity. Labor costs also vary depending on location, the experience of the contractor, and the complexity of the installation, which can impact the final cost significantly.
Material and Installation Costs
The cost per square foot for fiber cement siding typically ranges from $5 to $15, while stucco can range from $6 to $18 per square foot. These figures are estimates and can vary considerably. For instance, a premium fiber cement board with intricate detailing will be at the higher end of the spectrum, whereas a basic stucco application on a simple wall might fall toward the lower end. Regional differences also significantly affect these costs; labor and material prices fluctuate based on local market conditions and supply chain dynamics. For example, areas with high labor costs will naturally have higher installation expenses for both materials.
Installation costs encompass more than just the material price. They include labor for preparation (such as surface cleaning, repair, and priming), installation itself, and any finishing work. Fiber cement often requires specialized tools and expertise, potentially increasing labor costs. Stucco installation, while potentially less technically demanding, still requires skilled labor to ensure proper application and avoid cracking or other defects. Factors such as the home’s size, complexity of design (e.g., numerous angles, intricate details), and the accessibility of the work area all influence the total labor costs. A two-story home will inevitably be more expensive to clad than a single-story one.
Cost Comparison Table
The following table provides estimated costs for a 2,000 square foot home, illustrating the potential price differences between fiber cement and stucco. These figures are for illustrative purposes only and should not be considered precise bids. Always obtain multiple quotes from reputable contractors in your area to determine accurate costs.
| Material | Material Cost (per sq ft) | Labor Cost (per sq ft) | Total Estimated Cost (2000 sq ft home) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiber Cement (Mid-Range) | $8 | $5 | $26,000 |
| Stucco (Mid-Range) | $10 | $6 | $32,000 |
Insulation and Energy Efficiency
Choosing between fiber cement siding and stucco involves considering their impact on a building’s energy efficiency. Both materials offer varying levels of thermal protection, influencing heating and cooling costs. Understanding their insulation properties and how they interact with other building components is crucial for making an informed decision.
Fiber cement siding and stucco differ significantly in their inherent thermal performance. Fiber cement, a composite material, generally possesses lower thermal mass compared to stucco, meaning it doesn’t absorb and release heat as effectively. This can lead to more pronounced temperature fluctuations within the building envelope depending on external conditions. Stucco, being a cementitious material, exhibits higher thermal mass, acting as a thermal buffer against rapid temperature changes. This inherent characteristic contributes to better temperature stability inside the building.
Thermal Performance Comparison
Fiber cement siding’s relatively low thermal mass means that heat transfer through the material is quicker than with stucco. However, its insulating properties can be significantly improved through the addition of insulation behind the siding. This is typically achieved using rigid foam insulation boards, such as expanded polystyrene (EPS) or extruded polystyrene (XPS), which are installed directly to the sheathing before the fiber cement is applied. These boards create an effective thermal barrier, minimizing heat transfer and improving energy efficiency. A properly insulated fiber cement wall system can achieve a comparable level of insulation to a well-installed stucco system.
Stucco, on the other hand, while possessing better inherent thermal mass, can still benefit from additional insulation. In many cases, insulation is installed within the wall cavity, between the studs, using fiberglass batts or blown-in cellulose insulation. This approach provides a high R-value, which indicates the material’s resistance to heat flow. Furthermore, exterior insulation, such as an Exterior Insulation and Finish System (EIFS), can be applied over the stucco, further enhancing its thermal performance. EIFS systems combine insulation with a decorative stucco finish, creating a highly energy-efficient exterior wall assembly. In climates with extreme temperatures, combining high-performance insulation with stucco can significantly reduce energy consumption.
Energy Efficiency Contributions
The energy efficiency contributions of both materials are directly related to their thermal performance and the effectiveness of any additional insulation incorporated into the wall system. A well-insulated fiber cement system can significantly reduce heat loss in winter and heat gain in summer, resulting in lower energy bills. Similarly, a stucco system with appropriate insulation can provide excellent thermal control, minimizing the load on heating and cooling systems. The choice between the two depends largely on climate, building design, and the overall approach to energy efficiency in the project. For example, in a hot, arid climate, the higher thermal mass of stucco may be preferable to mitigate daytime heat gain, whereas in a colder climate, the ease of adding insulation to a fiber cement system might be more advantageous.
Insulation Techniques to Enhance Performance
Effective insulation techniques are critical for maximizing the energy efficiency of both fiber cement and stucco exteriors. For fiber cement, using high-R-value rigid foam insulation behind the siding is crucial. The thickness of the insulation should be selected based on climate zone and local building codes. For stucco, cavity insulation is often the primary method, but EIFS offers a superior approach for enhanced thermal performance, especially in regions with extreme temperatures. Proper installation of all insulation materials is essential to prevent thermal bridging and ensure continuous insulation, maximizing energy savings. A well-sealed building envelope is also crucial, as air leaks can significantly negate the benefits of insulation. In both cases, air sealing techniques such as using caulk and weatherstripping are essential to complement the insulation and create a truly energy-efficient building.
Maintenance and Repair
Regular maintenance is crucial for prolonging the lifespan and aesthetic appeal of any exterior cladding. Both fiber cement and stucco require attention, although the specific tasks and associated costs differ significantly. Understanding these differences will help homeowners make informed decisions about which material best suits their needs and budget.
Maintenance Tasks for Fiber Cement and Stucco
Fiber cement and stucco require different maintenance approaches. Fiber cement siding is generally low-maintenance, while stucco demands more frequent attention, especially in areas prone to moisture. Neglecting maintenance can lead to costly repairs down the line.
- Fiber Cement: Cleaning typically involves washing with a mild detergent and water solution using a soft brush or pressure washer (low pressure setting to avoid damage). Painting is usually necessary every 5-10 years, depending on sun exposure and climate. Repairing minor cracks or chips often involves patching with a specialized fiber cement repair compound, followed by painting to match the existing color.
- Stucco: Stucco requires more frequent cleaning, potentially several times a year, to remove dirt, mildew, and algae. Pressure washing (again, using a low-pressure setting) may be necessary. Painting is typically needed every 7-15 years, depending on environmental conditions. Repairing stucco damage, especially cracks, is more complex and often involves removing the damaged section, applying a bonding agent, and then applying new stucco, followed by texturing and painting to match the existing finish.
Repair Costs for Fiber Cement and Stucco
Repair costs vary widely depending on the extent of the damage, location, labor rates, and material costs. Minor repairs are generally less expensive than major repairs requiring significant material replacement and skilled labor.
- Fiber Cement: Repairing a small crack or chip in fiber cement siding might cost between $50 and $200, including materials and labor. Larger areas of damage could cost several hundred dollars or more. Replacing a whole panel might cost $100-$300 per panel plus labor.
- Stucco: Repairing minor cracks in stucco might cost between $100 and $300, while more extensive damage, such as repairing large cracks or holes, could easily cost $500-$1500 or more, depending on the size and complexity of the repair. Complete stucco replacement on a large section of a home could cost thousands of dollars.
Repairing Minor Damage: Fiber Cement
Addressing minor damage promptly prevents larger, more costly problems. For fiber cement, this is a relatively straightforward process.
- Clean the damaged area thoroughly to remove loose debris.
- Apply a fiber cement repair compound, following the manufacturer’s instructions.
- Allow the compound to dry completely.
- Sand the repaired area smooth.
- Prime the repaired area.
- Paint the repaired area to match the existing siding.
Repairing Minor Damage: Stucco
Repairing minor stucco damage requires more care and skill. Improper repair can lead to further cracking and water damage.
- Clean the damaged area thoroughly, removing loose or crumbling stucco.
- If the crack is significant, use a wire brush to widen and clean it to ensure proper adhesion of the repair material.
- Apply a bonding agent to the cleaned area to improve adhesion.
- Apply stucco patching compound, carefully matching the existing texture.
- Allow the compound to cure completely.
- Once cured, carefully sand the repaired area to blend it seamlessly with the surrounding stucco.
- Prime and paint the repaired area to match the existing stucco.
Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Choosing between fiber cement and stucco for your home’s exterior involves considering not only aesthetics and performance but also the environmental impact of each material. Both have advantages and disadvantages regarding their lifecycle, from manufacturing to disposal. A comprehensive assessment requires examining their embodied carbon, resource consumption, and recyclability.
The environmental impact of fiber cement and stucco differs significantly across their lifecycles. Manufacturing fiber cement typically involves higher energy consumption due to the cement production process, which is a significant emitter of greenhouse gases. Stucco, while often made with locally sourced materials, still requires energy for mixing, transportation, and application. Disposal also presents distinct challenges; fiber cement, while durable, is not easily recycled in many regions, often ending up in landfills. Stucco, being a composite material, can be more difficult to recycle effectively, although some components might be reclaimed.
Manufacturing Processes and Emissions
Fiber cement production is energy-intensive, primarily due to the high temperatures needed for cement clinker production. This process contributes significantly to carbon dioxide emissions. The manufacturing of stucco involves less energy-intensive processes, but the transportation of aggregates and other components can contribute to its overall carbon footprint. The exact emissions vary depending on the specific composition of each material and the manufacturing processes employed. For example, a fiber cement siding made with a higher percentage of fly ash (a byproduct of coal combustion) will have a lower carbon footprint than one using primarily Portland cement. Similarly, locally sourced stucco components will reduce transportation-related emissions compared to those sourced from distant locations.
Recycled Content and Recyclability
Some fiber cement products incorporate recycled materials, such as fly ash or recycled fibers, reducing their reliance on virgin resources. However, the recyclability of fiber cement at the end of its life is limited. While some components might be potentially reused in certain applications, widespread recycling infrastructure is lacking in many areas. Stucco, being a composite of cement, sand, and lime, also presents challenges in terms of recycling. The heterogeneous nature of the material makes separating its components for effective recycling difficult. While some components may be salvaged and reused, the overall recyclability of stucco is also low. The potential for using recycled aggregates in stucco mixes is an area of ongoing research and development, which may improve its sustainability profile in the future.
Carbon Footprint Throughout the Lifecycle
The carbon footprint of both fiber cement and stucco encompasses the entire lifecycle, from raw material extraction and manufacturing to transportation, installation, maintenance, and ultimately, disposal. While precise figures vary based on factors like geographical location, specific product composition, and transportation distances, several studies have attempted to quantify these impacts. These studies generally indicate that fiber cement often has a higher embodied carbon footprint than stucco due to the energy-intensive cement production. However, the longer lifespan of fiber cement can partially offset this higher initial carbon footprint. The overall environmental impact also depends on the maintenance and repair requirements of each material over its service life. For instance, frequent repairs might increase the overall carbon footprint of a material, regardless of its initial embodied carbon.
Aesthetic Considerations and Design Options
The aesthetic appeal of a home’s exterior is a crucial factor in its overall curb appeal and market value. Both fiber cement and stucco offer a diverse range of design possibilities, allowing homeowners to achieve a variety of looks to complement their architectural style and personal preferences. Understanding the aesthetic capabilities of each material is vital in making an informed decision.
Fiber cement and stucco provide distinct visual characteristics, influencing the overall aesthetic of a home. The choice between them often depends on the desired style and the architectural details of the house.
Color and Texture Variety
Fiber cement siding comes in a wide array of colors, achieved through painting or through the manufacturing process itself. Many manufacturers offer a vast palette of shades, allowing for customization to match any architectural style. The texture can vary from smooth to wood-grain, offering versatility in achieving different visual effects. For instance, a smooth finish might be preferred for a modern home, while a wood-grain texture could enhance the rustic charm of a farmhouse. Stucco, on the other hand, is typically applied in a variety of textures, ranging from smooth to heavily textured finishes. The color is usually achieved through the addition of pigments to the stucco mix, resulting in a wide spectrum of color options, although repainting is also possible. The texture of stucco can significantly impact the overall appearance; a smooth stucco finish lends a sleek, contemporary look, while a rougher texture can create a more rustic or traditional feel.
Architectural Style Compatibility
Fiber cement siding’s versatility allows it to seamlessly integrate with various architectural styles. Its ability to mimic wood, stone, or brick makes it suitable for traditional, craftsman, and even contemporary homes. For example, fiber cement siding with a wood-grain texture can beautifully complement a craftsman-style home, while smooth, painted fiber cement can create a clean, modern look for a contemporary dwelling. Stucco, with its diverse textures and color options, is equally adaptable. Smooth stucco is often preferred for modern and Mediterranean styles, while textured stucco can enhance the rustic appeal of southwestern or Spanish colonial architecture. The ability to create intricate details and patterns with stucco further expands its design possibilities, making it suitable for homes with ornate detailing.
Examples of Visually Appealing Exteriors
A home clad in dark gray, smooth fiber cement siding with crisp white trim exemplifies a modern, minimalist aesthetic. The clean lines and neutral color palette create a sophisticated and timeless look. Conversely, a home featuring fiber cement siding that mimics the look of natural wood shingles, paired with stone accents, evokes a classic, rustic charm. This combination creates a warm and inviting exterior, perfect for a traditional or craftsman-style home. In contrast, a home with light beige, heavily textured stucco, accented by terracotta tiles and wrought-iron detailing, showcases a Mediterranean or Southwestern style. The warm tones and rough texture create a sense of warmth and character. A sleek, white stucco finish, combined with large windows and minimalist landscaping, could achieve a contemporary, clean look, emphasizing simplicity and elegance.
Fire Resistance and Safety
Both fiber cement and stucco offer varying degrees of fire resistance, contributing differently to a building’s overall fire safety. Understanding their respective properties is crucial for ensuring building code compliance and minimizing fire risks. This section will compare their fire resistance ratings and explore how each material impacts a building’s fire safety profile.
Fiber cement siding, composed primarily of cement, sand, and cellulose fibers, possesses inherent fire-resistant properties. It does not readily ignite and can withstand high temperatures for extended periods. Stucco, a cementitious composite material, also exhibits good fire resistance due to its high mineral content. However, the specific fire performance of both materials can vary based on factors such as thickness, composition, and the presence of any combustible backing materials.
Fire Resistance Ratings and Characteristics
The fire resistance of both fiber cement and stucco is typically assessed using standardized fire testing methods, which measure their ability to resist the spread of flames and heat. These tests provide ratings that indicate how long a material can withstand fire exposure before structural failure or significant heat transfer occurs. While precise ratings can vary depending on the specific product and testing standards used, fiber cement and stucco generally achieve similar ratings in terms of their resistance to fire spread. However, it’s important to note that the fire resistance of the entire building assembly, including the framing and insulation, is a crucial factor in overall fire safety, not solely the exterior cladding.
Contribution to Overall Fire Safety
Fiber cement and stucco, when properly installed, act as a fire barrier, slowing the spread of flames across the exterior walls. This provides crucial time for occupants to evacuate and firefighters to arrive. The non-combustible nature of both materials helps to prevent the rapid escalation of fires, limiting the potential for significant damage. However, the presence of any combustible materials behind the cladding, such as wood framing or insulation, needs to be addressed with appropriate fire-retardant treatments or protective measures to ensure optimal fire safety.
Fire Safety Regulations and Codes
Building codes and fire safety regulations vary by location, but generally require exterior cladding materials to meet specific fire resistance standards. These codes often dictate minimum requirements for fire spread, flame spread index, and smoke generation. Compliance with these regulations is essential for obtaining building permits and ensuring the safety of the structure and its occupants. Consult local building codes and fire safety regulations to determine the specific requirements for exterior cladding materials in your area. It’s crucial to use products that meet or exceed these standards to ensure compliance and maintain a safe building environment.
Water Resistance and Moisture Management
Both fiber cement and stucco are designed to withstand the elements, but their approaches to water resistance and moisture management differ significantly. Understanding these differences is crucial for selecting the best exterior cladding for a particular climate and building type. Proper installation and maintenance play a vital role in preventing water damage and ensuring the longevity of either material.
Fiber cement’s inherent water resistance stems from its composite nature. The cement matrix, reinforced with cellulose fibers, creates a dense, non-porous material that is relatively impervious to water penetration. However, improper installation, such as inadequate sealing around joints and fasteners, can compromise this resistance. Stucco, on the other hand, is a porous material. While its inherent water resistance is lower than fiber cement’s, its ability to manage moisture depends heavily on proper installation, including the use of a water-resistant barrier (like a housewrap) beneath and a properly applied and sealed finish coat.
Fiber Cement Water Resistance Properties
Fiber cement siding’s inherent density and low porosity provide excellent resistance to water penetration. This minimizes the risk of water damage, which can lead to structural issues, rot, and mold growth. However, the material is not completely impervious. Water can still enter through cracks, gaps, or improperly sealed areas. Therefore, meticulous installation and regular inspection are crucial to maintaining its water resistance. For example, ensuring proper flashing around windows and doors prevents water from seeping behind the siding. Regularly checking for and sealing any cracks or gaps will prevent water intrusion.
Stucco Water Resistance Properties
Stucco’s water resistance relies on a multi-layered system. A water-resistant barrier beneath the stucco prevents moisture from entering the wall cavity. The stucco itself, applied in multiple coats, forms a protective layer, although its porosity means some moisture penetration is possible. The final coat, often a textured finish, helps to shed water. However, if the underlying barrier is compromised or the stucco is not properly applied, water can easily penetrate, leading to damage to the wall structure and potential mold growth. A common example of stucco failure is the cracking of the finish coat, allowing water to enter. This is often due to poor installation, movement of the underlying structure, or lack of expansion joints.
Water Damage and Mold Growth Potential
Both fiber cement and stucco can be susceptible to water damage and subsequent mold growth if not properly installed and maintained. Fiber cement, while inherently more water-resistant, can experience damage if water is allowed to penetrate through cracks or improperly sealed areas. This can lead to deterioration of the material itself, potentially requiring costly repairs or replacements. Stucco, being more porous, is more vulnerable to water damage, especially if the underlying moisture barrier is not installed correctly. Water penetration can cause the stucco to weaken, crack, and eventually peel. This creates ideal conditions for mold growth, posing serious health risks.
Mitigation of Water-Related Issues
Proper installation techniques are paramount in mitigating water-related issues for both fiber cement and stucco. For fiber cement, this includes using appropriate flashing and sealants around windows, doors, and other penetrations. Regular inspection and prompt repair of any cracks or damage are essential. For stucco, a high-quality water-resistant barrier is crucial. Proper application of the stucco itself, ensuring a smooth, continuous surface with minimal cracks, is also vital. Regular inspection for cracks or areas of water penetration is necessary to address any issues promptly. Using high-quality, breathable paints or sealants can also help to protect the stucco and prevent moisture buildup.
Last Point
Choosing between fiber cement and stucco for your home’s exterior depends on a careful weighing of several factors. While both offer long-lasting performance, fiber cement often boasts superior durability and lower maintenance, though potentially at a higher initial cost. Stucco, on the other hand, can provide a more customizable aesthetic and may be a more budget-friendly option upfront. Ultimately, the best choice hinges on your budget, aesthetic preferences, climate, and long-term maintenance considerations. By carefully considering the information presented, you can confidently select the exterior material that best suits your individual needs and enhances the beauty and value of your home.